Frequently asked questions
What is round zero in packaging redesign?
Round zero is a structured alignment session held before the first design comps are produced. It resolves four questions: what the redesign must accomplish, what can’t change, who makes the final decision and by what criteria, and what format the comps will take at each review stage. Its function is to eliminate ambiguity before that ambiguity becomes revision rounds.
Why do packaging redesigns run more rounds than planned?
Most overruns trace back to the same root cause: alignment work that was deferred to the design phase. When the job is ambiguous, the decision-maker is unclear, or the success criteria are undefined, feedback from multiple stakeholders accumulates without a clear way to prioritize or resolve it. Rounds multiply not because the design is weak, but because the inputs were never reconciled.
How do physical comps reduce iteration in a packaging redesign?
Physical comps surface the problems digital files can’t detect: color accuracy on physical substrates, structural performance under real conditions, and the sensory cues that signal quality to a shopper. Catching those issues in a comp costs far less than catching them in production. Digital mockups move fast in the early rounds, and a physical comp is what keeps a structural or sensory surprise from reaching the line.
When should physical comps be introduced in the redesign process?
Use digital mockups for early-stage iteration: direction-setting, color exploration, concept narrowing. Introduce physical comps once the field has been reduced to two or three strong candidates. Physical validation should happen before final production specifications are locked, not after. The sequence protects against both wasted spend on premature physical production and the structural or sensory surprises that only a real prototype can reveal.